4.3 Article

Thirty-six years of legal and illegal wildlife trade entering the USA

Journal

ORYX
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 432-441

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0030605319000541

Keywords

CITES; consumer awareness; consumer demand; illegal wildlife trade; legal wildlife trade; seizures; trade database; USA

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF96]
  2. VILLUM FONDEN [VKR023371]
  3. GCRF Trade Hub
  4. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [H2020-MSCA-IF-2015-706784]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found a positive relationship between legal imports and seizures, with Asia being the main region exporting CITES-listed wildlife products to the USA. Trade volumes of bears, crocodilians, and other mammals increased over time.
The USA is the largest consumer of legally, internationally-traded wildlife. A proportion of this trade consists of species listed in the Appendices of CITES, and recorded in the CITES Trade Database. Using this resource, we quantified wildlife entering the USA for 82 of the most frequently recorded wildlife products and a range of taxonomic groups during 1979-2014. We examined trends in legal trade and seizures of illegally traded items over time, and relationships between trade and four national measures of biodiversity. We found that: (1) there is an overall positive relationship between legal imports and seizures; (2) Asia was the main region exporting CITES-listed wildlife products to the USA; (3) bears, crocodilians and other mammals (i.e. other than Ursidae, Felidae, Cetacea, Proboscidea, Primates or Rhinocerotidae) increased in both reported legal trade and seizures over time; (4) legal trade in live specimens was reported to be primarily from captive-produced, artificially-propagated or ranched sources, whereas traded meat was primarily wild sourced; (5) both seizures and legally traded items of felids and elephants decreased over time; and (6) volumes of both legally traded and seized species were correlated with four attributes of exporting countries: species endemism, species richness, number of IUCN threatened species, and country size. The goal of our analysis was to inform CITES decision-making and species conservation efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available