4.6 Article

Machine-learning attacks on interference-based optical encryption: experimental demonstration

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages 26143-26154

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.026143

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61605165]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [25201416]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission through Basic Research Program [JCYJ20160531184426473]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optical techniques have boosted a new class of cryptographic systems with some remarkable advantages. and optical encryption not only has spurred practical developments but also has brought a new insight into cryptography. However, this does not mean that it is elusive for the opponents to attack optical encryption systems. In this paper, for the first time to our knowledge, we experimentally demonstrate the machine-learning attacks on interference-based optical encryption. Using machine-learning models that are trained by a series of ciphertext-plaintext pairs, an unauthorized person is capable to retrieve the unknown plaintexts from the given ciphertexts without the usage of various different optical encryption keys existing in interference-based optical encryption. In comparison with conventional cryptanaly tic methods, the proposed machine-learning-based attacking method can estimate transfer function or point spread function of interference-based optical encryption systems without subsidiary conditions. Simulations and optical experiments demonstrate feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method, and the proposed machine-learning-based attacking method provides a versatile approach to analyzing the vulnerability of interference-based optical encryption. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available