4.5 Article

Rotating night shift work and risk of multiple sclerosis in the Nurses' Health Studies

Journal

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 76, Issue 10, Pages 733-738

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106016

Keywords

night shift work; shift work; circadian disruption; multiple sclerosis; cohort study

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [T32 HL007575, UM1 CA186107, UM1 CA176726, R01NS046635]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Night shift work has been suggested as a possible risk factor for multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of the present analysis was to prospectively evaluate the association of rotating night shift work history and MS risk in two female cohorts, the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHSII. Methods A total of 83 992 (NHS) and 114 427 (NHSII) women were included in this analysis. We documented 579 (109 in NHS and 470 in NHSII) incident physician-confirmed MS cases (moderate and definite diagnosis), including 407 definite MS cases. The history (cumulative years) of rotating night shifts (>= 3 nights/month) was assessed at baseline and updated throughout follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs for the association between rotating night shift work and MS risk adjusting for potential confounders. Results We observed no association between history of rotating night shift work and MS risk in NHS (1-9 years: HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.54; 10+ years: 1.15, 0.62 to 2.15) and NHSII (1-9 years: HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.09; 10+ years: 1.03, 0.72 to 1.49). In NHSII, rotating night shift work history of 20+ years was significantly associated with MS risk, when restricting to definite MS cases (1-9 years: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.11; 10-19 years: 0.98, 0.62 to 1.55; 20+ years: 2.62, 1.06 to 6.46). Conclusions Overall, we found no association between rotating night shift work history and MS risk in these two large cohorts of nurses. In NHSII, shift work history of 20 or more years was associated with an increased risk of definite MS diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available