4.8 Article

Molecular affinity rulers: systematic evaluation of DNA aptamers for their applicabilities in ELISA

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 16, Pages 8362-8374

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz688

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore)
  2. National Research Foundation of Singapore [NRF-CRP17-2017-07]
  3. NRF Singapore [NRF-CRP17-2017-07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many nucleic acid aptamers that bind to target molecules have been reported as antibody alternatives. However, while the affinities of aptamers vary widely, little is known about the relationship between the affinities and their applicabilities for practical use. Here, we developed molecular affinity rulers: a series of DNA aptamers with different affinities that bind to the same area of target molecules, to measure the aptamer and its device applicabilities. For the ruler preparation, we used high-affinity DNA aptamers containing a hydrophobic unnatural base (Ds) as the fifth base. By replacing Ds bases with A bases in Ds-DNA aptamers targeting VEGF(165) and interferon-gamma, we prepared two sets of DNA aptamers with dissociation constants (K-D) ranging from 10(-12) to 10(-8) M. Using these molecular affinity rulers, we evaluated the sensitivity of DNA aptamers in ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), which showed the clear relationship between aptamer affinities and their detection sensitivities. In sandwich-type ELISA using combinations of aptamers and antibodies, aptamers with K-D values lower than similar to 10(-9) M were required for sufficient sensitivities (limit of detection (LOD) < 10 pM) and signal intensities, but optimizations improved the lower-affinity aptamers' applicabilities. These aptamer affinity rulers could be useful for evaluating and improving aptamer applicabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available