4.1 Article

In-vivo imaging of methionine metabolism in patients with suspected malignant pleural mesothelioma

Journal

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 40, Issue 11, Pages 1179-1186

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001078

Keywords

diagnosis; malignant pleural mesothelioma; methionine; nodal involvement

Funding

  1. Umberto Veronesi Foundation
  2. Italian Association for Research on Cancer (AIRC -Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives In-vivo characterization of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) with C-11-methionine PET/computed tomography (MET PET). Methods Between September 2014 and February 2016, 30 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of MPM were prospectively recruited. The study was approved and registered at (NCT02519049). Patients were evaluated at baseline with MET PET (experimental) and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (FDG PET) (standard). Principal parameters analyzed were SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and metabolic tumor burden (MTB = MTV xSUV(mean)). The reference standard for diagnostic performance was based on histology. Results The presence of malignancy was confirmed in 29/30 patients: 23 (76.6%) with MPM (20 epithelioid, two biphasic, and one sarcomatoid), five (16.6%) with adenocarcinoma of the lung, and one (3.3%) with an undifferentiated carcinoma. In one case, diagnosis was benign pleural inflammation. All tumors showed increased uptake of C-11-methionine: median SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and MTB were, respectively, 5.70 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.51-6.79], 3.15 (95% CI: 2.71-3.40), 33.85 (95% CI: 14.08-66.64), and 105.25 (95% CI: 41.77-215.25). Pathology data revealed MTV and MTB to be significantly higher in nonepithelioid histology (P < 0.05). The other parameters showed a homogeneous distribution across the tumor types. Overall, MET PET identified 49 lymph nodes, compared with 34 nodes on FDG PET, demonstrating a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 80-96%), a positive predictive value of 92% (95% CI: 82- 97%), and an accuracy of 85% (P = 0.0042). Conclusions MET PET is able to characterize MPM lesions regardless of histology. This technique shows higher sensitivity than FDG PET for the identification of secondary lymph nodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available