4.4 Article

Aboveground biomass, transpiration and water use efficiency in eucalypt plantation fertilized with KCl, NaCl and phonolite rock powder

Journal

NEW FORESTS
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 469-488

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-019-09743-8

Keywords

Potassium; Beneficial element; Rocks for crops; Ecophysiology; Transpiration

Categories

Funding

  1. CAPES
  2. FAPESP
  3. CNPq [406809/2016-0, 150505/2014-0]
  4. MineracAo Curimbaba S.A.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Potassium has important physiological functions in eucalypt plantations, increasing their productivity when applied to soil via mineral fertilizers. There is interest in identifying alternative sources to KCl owing to its high cost and limited reserves. The aim of the study was to test the effect of replacing KCl with NaCl and phonolite rock powder. Two comparisons were made: (1) application of 283 kg ha(-1) of KCl compared with that of 2125 kg ha(-1) of phonolite rock powder (equivalent to 170 kg ha(-1) of K2O in both treatments); (2) application of 139 kg ha(-1) of NaCl compared with that of 183 kg ha(-1) of KCl (equivalent to 2.33 kmol Na and K, respectively). Radial growth, soil water content, leaf water potential (psi), accumulated transpiration, stem volume and biomass increment, as well as water use efficiency (WUE) were evaluated. In the first comparison, both fertilizations presented equal values for all characteristics evaluated. In the second, the accumulated transpiration in trees fertilized with KCl was 17% higher than that in plants fertilized with NaCl. In contrast, the WUE was 20% higher in the trees fertilized with NaCl than in those fertilized with KCl, reflecting the lower water consumption for the same increment in stem volume and biomass. We conclude that phonolite rock powder and NaCl are possible substitutes for conventional K fertilization performed with KCl.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available