4.8 Article

Functional characterization of EI24-induced autophagy in the degradation of RING-domain E3 ligases

Journal

AUTOPHAGY
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 2038-2053

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1217371

Keywords

autophagy; computational biology; E3 ligase; EI24; proteasome; RING-domain

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2015R1A2A1A01003845, 2010-0020878]
  2. Institute for Basic Science - Korean ministry of science, ICT, and future planning [IBS-R013-G1-2014-a00]
  3. National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs (MoHWFA), Republic of Korea [1020220]
  4. The Yonsei University Yonsei-SNU Collaborative Research Fund
  5. Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Historically, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and autophagy pathways were believed to be independent; however, recent data indicate that these pathways engage in crosstalk. To date, the players mediating this crosstalk have been elusive. Here, we show experimentally that EI24 (EI24, autophagy associated transmembrane protein), a key component of basal macroautophagy/autophagy, degrades 14 physiologically important E3 ligases with a RING (really interesting new gene) domain, whereas 5 other ligases were not degraded. Based on the degradation results, we built a statistical model that predicts the RING E3 ligases targeted by EI24 using partial least squares discriminant analysis. Of 381 RING E3 ligases examined computationally, our model predicted 161 EI24 targets. Those targets are primarily involved in transcription, proteolysis, cellular bioenergetics, and apoptosis and regulated by TP53 and MTOR signaling. Collectively, our work demonstrates that EI24 is an essential player in UPS-autophagy crosstalk via degradation of RING E3 ligases. These results indicate a paradigm shift regarding the fate of E3 ligases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available