4.0 Article

Effects of habitat fragmentation on the bats of Kakamega Forest, western Kenya

Journal

JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 260-269

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0266467419000221

Keywords

Bats; foraging mode; forest use; habitat fragmentation; tropical rain forest

Categories

Funding

  1. British Ecological Society [BES 3571/4375]
  2. International Foundation of Science [IFS D/5278-1]
  3. Kenya's NACOSTI
  4. Field Museum's Council on Africa
  5. Barbara E. Brown Fund for Mammal Research
  6. JRS Biodiversity Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Habitat loss and fragmentation are major threats to biodiversity worldwide, and little is known about their effects on bats in Africa. We investigated effects of forest fragmentation on bat assemblages at Kakamega Forest, western Kenya, examining captures at edge and interior locations in three forest fragments (Buyangu, 3950 ha; Kisere, 400 ha; and Malava, 100 ha) varying in forest area and human-use regimes. Basal area, canopy cover, tree density and intensity of human use were used as predictors of bat abundance and species richness. A total of 3456 mist-net hours and 3168 harp-trap hours resulted in the capture of 4983 bats representing 26 species, eight families and four foraging ensembles (frugivores, forest-interior insectivores, forest-edge insectivores and open-space insectivores). Frugivores were frequently captured at the edges of the larger, better-protected forests, but also in the interior of the smaller, more open fragment. Forest-interior insectivores and narrow-space foragers predominated in the interiors of larger fragments but avoided the smallest one. Forest specialists showed positive associations with forest variables (canopy cover, basal area and tree density), whereas frugivores responded positively to the human-use indicators. On these bases, specialist species appear to be especially vulnerable to forest fragmentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available