4.4 Article

A Polygenic Risk Score for Breast Cancer in US Latinas and Latin American Women

Journal

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages 590-598

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz174

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [K24CA169004, R01CA120120, R01CA184545, K08CA237829, UM1 CA164920, R01CA063446, R01CA077305, R01CA204797]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [KL2TR001870]
  3. US Department of Defense [DAMD17-96-1-6071]
  4. California Breast Cancer Research Program [7PB-0068]
  5. Kaiser Permanente national and regional Community Benefit programs
  6. Ellison Medical Foundation
  7. Wayne and Gladys Valley Foundation
  8. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  9. National Institutes of Health [RC2AG036607, R01CA63464, R37CA54281, R01CA132839, 5UM1CA164973]
  10. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico [SALUD-2002-C01-7462]
  11. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (Lima, Peru)
  12. School of Medicine (Dean's Fellowship in Precision Health Equity)
  13. Office of the Provost for LGC-C's Latinos United for Cancer Health Advancement (LUCHA) Initiative
  14. V Foundation for Cancer Research (V Foundation Scholarship)
  15. GSK Oncology (Ethnic Research Initiative)
  16. US National Institutes of Health (Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute) [P30CA093372]
  17. Colciencias [755/2016]
  18. Universidad del Tolima, Colombia [10112]
  19. Sistema Nacional de Regalias, Gobernacion del Tolima [520115]
  20. Coordinacion Nacional de Investigacion en Salud, IMSS, Mexico [FIS/IMSS/PROT/PRIO/13/027]
  21. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Fronteras de la Ciencia grant), Mexico [773]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: More than 180 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with breast cancer susceptibility have been identified; these SNPs can be combined into polygenic risk scores (PRS) to predict breast cancer risk. Because most SNPs were identified in predominantly European populations, little is known about the performance of PRS in non-Europeans. We tested the performance of a 180-SNP PRS in Latinas, a large ethnic group with variable levels of Indigenous American, European, and African ancestry. Methods: We conducted a pooled case-control analysis of US Latinas and Latin American women (4658 cases and 7622 controls). We constructed a 180-SNP PRS consisting of SNPs associated with breast cancer risk (P < 5 x 10(-8)). We evaluated the association between the PRS and breast cancer risk using multivariable logistic regression, and assessed discrimination using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We also assessed PRS performance across quartiles of Indigenous American genetic ancestry. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Of 180 SNPs tested, 142 showed directionally consistent associations compared with European populations, and 39 were nominally statistically significant (P < .05). The PRS was associated with breast cancer risk, with an odds ratio per SD increment of 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI = 1.52 to 1.64) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.63 (95% CI = 0.62 to 0.64). The discrimination of the PRS was similar between the top and bottom quartiles of Indigenous American ancestry. Conclusions: The 180-SNP PRS predicts breast cancer risk in Latinas, with similar performance as reported for Europeans. The performance of the PRS did not vary substantially according to Indigenous American ancestry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available