4.6 Review

International Survey of Food Fraud and Related Terminology: Preliminary Results and Discussion

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 84, Issue 10, Pages 2705-2718

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14705

Keywords

adulteration; authenticity; crime; economically motivated adulteration; food fraud; food defense; food protection; food safety; integrity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The food industry is advancing at a rapid pace and consumer sensitivity to food safety scares and food fraud scandals is further amplified by rapid communication such as by social media. Academia, regulators, and industry practitioners alike struggle with an evolving issue regarding new terms and definitions including food fraud, food authenticity, food integrity, food protection, economically motivated adulteration, food crime, food security, contaminant, adulterant, and others. This research addressed some of the global need for clarification and harmonization of commonly used terminology. The 150 survey responses were received from various food-related workgroups or committee members, communication with recognized experts, and announcements to the food industry in general. Overall food fraud was identified as a food safety issue (86%). The food quality and manufacturing respondents focused mainly on incoming goods and adulterant-substances (<50%) rather than the other illegal activities such as counterfeiting, theft, gray market/diversion, and smuggling. Of the terms included to represent intentional deception for economic gain the respondents generally agreed with food fraud as the preferred term. Overall, the preference was 50% food fraud, 15% economically motivated adulteration EMA, 9% food protection, 7% food integrity, 5% food authenticity, and 2% food crime. It appears that food protection and food integrity are terms that cover broader concepts such as all types of intentional acts and even possibly food safety or food quality. Food authenticity was defined with the phrase to ensure so seemed to be identified as an attribute that helped define fraudulent acts. Practical Application Food Fraud-illegal deception for economic gain using food-is a rapidly evolving research topic and is facing confusion due to the use of different terms and definitions. This research survey presented common definitions and publication details to gain insight that could help provide clarity. The insight from this report provides guidance for others who are harmonizing terminology and setting the overall strategic direction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available