4.8 Article

Robust Faulted Line Identification in Power Distribution Networks via Hybrid State Estimator

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 5365-5377

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2019.2899130

Keywords

Active distribution networks; cyber-physical system (CPS); distributed generation (DG); faulted line identification; hybrid state estimator (HSE); phasor measurement units (PMU)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51677025]
  2. State Grid Corporation of China [52110417000A]
  3. Summit of the Six Top Talents Project of Jiangsu Province [XNY-005]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [KYLX16_0212]
  5. Australian Research Council [DP170102303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Distribution networks with high penetration of distributed generation yield complicated and uncertain power flow, which makes most existing faulted line identification methods not adaptable for industrial applications. Driven by this motivation, a novel single-phase-to-ground (SPTG) faulted line identification method is proposed based on hybrid state estimator (HSE). The first step of the method is to present an HSE for power distribution networks using power flow measurements mixed phasor measurement units. Then, an SPTG fault on a power line is treated as an event that suddenly increases one virtual bus in the monitored network, so as to form the extended bus admittance matrix and augmented HSE based on the specific network topology. In this way, the faulted line identification could be obtained by computing parallel estimated results transversally. Robustness and effectiveness of the proposed HSE and the HSE-based SPTG faulted line identification method are validated by means of a cyber-physical system (a cosimulation platform), where two typical three-phase power distribution networks are considered to simulate with its hybrid measurement system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available