4.7 Article

Structural connectivity profile supports laterality of the salience network

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 40, Issue 18, Pages 5242-5255

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24769

Keywords

aging; diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; frontal insula cortex; laterality; salience network; structural connectivity

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M611175]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0909201, 2018YFC1314300]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81425013, 81571659, 81601473, 81771818]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [17JCYBJC29200]
  5. Tianjin Key Technology RD Program [17ZXMFSY00090]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The salience network (SN) is mainly involved in detecting and filtering multimodal salient stimuli, and mediating the switch between the default mode network and central executive network. Early studies have indicated a right-sided dominance in the functional organization of the SN; however, the anatomical basis of the functional lateralization remains unclear. Here, we hypothesized that the structural connectivity profile between the frontoinsular cortex (FIC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), which are two core hubs of the SN, is also dominant in the right hemisphere. Based on diffusion and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rfMRI) of adult healthy volunteers in independent datasets, we found a stable right-sided laterality of both the FIC-dACC structural and functional connectivity in both the human connectome project cohort and a local Chinese cohort. Furthermore, a significant effect of aging on the integrity of the right FIC-dACC structural connectivity was also identified. The right-sided laterality of the structural organization of the SN may help us to better understand the functional roles of the SN in the normal human brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available