4.6 Article

Consumers' valuation for food traceability in China: Does trust matter?

Journal

FOOD POLICY
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101768

Keywords

Choice experiment; Interaction effects; Fuji apple products; Willingness to pay; Chinese consumer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71403082]
  2. Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science Research Project of China [14YCJ790080]
  3. National Social Science Foundation of China [14BGL093]
  4. 2017 Annual Scientific and Technological Innovation of Henan Province Talent (Humanities and Social Sciences) Support Program [2017-cxrc-002]
  5. Young Backbone Teachers Scheme of Henan Colleges and Universities [2015GGJS-085]
  6. Henan Province Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project [2017BJJ033]
  7. Henan Provincial Department of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project [2019-ZZJH-327]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Food safety is a very important topic in China. We investigate Chinese consumers' preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for food traceability using a choice experiment. Given that consumers' trust in the food system may affect their preferences and WTP, we also assess the interaction between consumers' trust in government's supervision of food safety and food labels and consumers' preferences for traceable food products. Using data collected from a choice experiment on Fuji apples in a face-to-face survey in six Chinese cities, the results show that (i) consumers are willing to pay for traceable food but their valuations can differ upon the degree of their trust in government's supervision of food safety and food labels; (ii) consumers are willing to pay for traceability with strong evidence of preference heterogeneity; (iii) government is not the most trusted safety inspection and certificate authority as found in prior studies using animal food products in China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available