4.6 Article

Obesity in pregnancy causes a volume overload in third trimester

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13173

Keywords

circulation; maternal haemodynamics; obesity; physiology; pregnancy

Funding

  1. Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Obesity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the maternal circulatory differences during pregnancy between obese and normal weight women. Materials and methods The functioning of the maternal circulation (arteries, veins, heart and body fluid) was assessed by ECG-Doppler ultrasound, impedance cardiography (ICG) and bio-impedance during pregnancy in obese women (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) and normal weight, nonobese women (BMI 20-25 kg/m(2)). In this observational study, 232 assessments were performed in the obese group, whereas 919 assessments were performed in the nonobese group. Results Relative to nonobese women, the overall cardiovascular function in obese women during first and second trimester is consistent with a high volume/low-resistance circulation. In third trimester, cardiac output of obese women decreases from 9.2 (8.2-10.7) L/min to 8.5 (7.6-9.6) L/min (P = .037) whereas this is not true in the nonobese women (from 7.8 (7-8.5) L/min to 7.8 (6.8-8.9) L/min, P = .536). Simultaneously, the persistently lower peripheral vascular resistance in obese vs nonobese women disappears (880 (761-1060) dyn.sec/cm(5) vs 928 (780-1067). Conclusions The circulatory gestational adaptations between nonobese and obese women were generally similar. The findings in the third trimester suggest that a pregnancy in obese women start as a state of high volume/low resistance, gradually shifting to a volume overload with decrease of cardiac output and disappearance of low vascular resistance. This evolution makes obese women vulnerable for gestational hypertensive diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available