4.8 Article

Climate and Vegetation As Primary Drivers for Global Mercury Storage in Surface Soil

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 18, Pages 10665-10675

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02386

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Programs of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. Pan-Third Pole Environment Study for a Green Silk Road (Pan-TPE) [XDA2004050201]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41829701, 41703135, 41771062]
  4. K.C.Wong Education Foundation
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [BX201700235, 2017M620432]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil is the largest Hg reservoir globally. Data of Hg concentration in surface soil are fundamental to understanding environmental Hg cycling. However, present knowledge on the quantity and global distribution of Hg in soil remains deficient. Using stable Hg isotopic analyses and geospatial data, the concentration and global spatial distribution of Hg in surface soil of 0-20 cm depth have been developed. It is estimated that 1088 +/- 379 Gg of Hg is stored in surface soil globally. Thirty-two percent of the surface Hg storage resides in tropical/subtropical forest regions, 23% in temperate/boreal forest regions, 28% in grassland and steppe and shrubland, 7% in tundra, and 10% in desert and xeric shrubland. Evidence from Hg isotopic signatures points to atmospheric Hg-0 dry deposition through vegetation uptake as the primary source of Hg in surface soil. Given the influence of changing climate on vegetative development, global climate change can act as an important forcing factor for shaping spatial distribution of Hg in surface soil. This active forcing cycle significantly dilutes the impacts caused by Hg release from anthropogenic sources, and needs to be considered in assessing the effectiveness of reducing Hg use and emissions as specified in Minamata Convention on Mercury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available