4.7 Article

How can carbon capture utilization and storage be incentivized in China? A perspective based on the 45Q tax credit provisions

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 1229-1240

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.07.010

Keywords

Subsidy policy; CCUS retrofitting investment; 45Q tax credit provisions; Real options; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71503249, 71874193, 71203008]
  2. Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research [CBA2018-02MY-Fan]
  3. Open Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining (China University of Mining and Technology) [SKLCRSM19KFA14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) technologies are crucial for achieving long-term climate change goals in China. Drawing on the 45Q tax credit provisions enacted by the U.S., three subsidy modes, two scenarios and two carbon emission reduction options are developed in this study, in which the real options approach combined with a trinomial tree model is employed to evaluate investment decisions made by coal-fired power plants (CFPP) in China. The results show that offering a 12-year CO2 storage subsidy to full-chain CCUS CFPP provides the motivation needed for CCUS investment during the 12-year subsidy period; however the economic benefits of such investment cannot be sustained over the 40-year lifetime. It's economically viable for CFPP to capture 90% CO2 emissions and sell them to oil enterprises for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) over a 40-year period. Besides, for full-chain CCUS CFPP the incentive effects of the 45Q subsidy mode and the full initial investment plus operation and maintenance (I + O&M) subsidy mode are much more suited to the 40-year emission reduction option, whereas the simple O&M subsidy mode is more suitable for the 12-year emission reduction option. However, for CO2-EOR projects, there is no significant difference between the three subsidy modes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available