4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Hybrid thermal power plants: Solar-electricity and fuel-electricity productions

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages 682-689

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.073

Keywords

Solar hybrid thermal power plants; Ideal cycle efficiency; Cycle efficiency; Factor of internal losses; Solar-electricity generation; Fuel-electricity generation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In response to global climate target, over the last decade renewable electricity generation from solar energy has grown rapidly and hence measures to deal with its non-dispatchable nature. Integrating concentrating solar plants in conventional fossil power plants is a widely researched solution to tackle solar energy intermittency. This results in hybrid power plants whose total electricity production consists of two different contributions (solar and fuel-electricity) that can be evaluated separately by implementing numerical methods based on the so-called with and without solar energy approach. Nonetheless, such evaluation cannot be carried out in actual power plants operation where fossil and renewable contributions are not discernible from each other within the overall production. To overcome this limitation, and consequently allow the total electricity generated to be properly partitioned among energy sources, this study proposes and validates an alternative on-line and real-time method to quantitatively assess solar and fuel-electricity by subdividing the overall cycle efficiency into subsequent ones related to the different energy conversion processes during real plant operation. Required input can be derived from available operating data except for factor of internal losses that, however, showing negligible dependence on solar energy and power plant load, can be reasonably assumed constant and estimated in dedicated calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available