4.5 Review

The Four-C Framework for High Capacity Ultra-Low Latency in 5G Networks: A Review

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 12, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12183449

Keywords

5G; ultra-reliable communication; ultra-low latency; SDN; NFV; MU-MIMO; MM2M; caching; computing; virtualization

Categories

Funding

  1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia [FRGS/1/2018/ICT03/UKM/02/3]
  2. Malaysian Ministry of Education [FRGS/1/2018/ICT03/UKM/02/3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Network latency will be a critical performance metric for the Fifth Generation (5G) networks expected to be fully rolled out in 2020 through the IMT-2020 project. The multi-user multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO) technology is a key enabler for the 5G massive connectivity criterion, especially from the massive densification perspective. Naturally, it appears that 5G MU-MIMO will face a daunting task to achieve an end-to-end 1 ms ultra-low latency budget if traditional network set-ups criteria are strictly adhered to. Moreover, 5G latency will have added dimensions of scalability and flexibility compared to prior existing deployed technologies. The scalability dimension caters for meeting rapid demand as new applications evolve. While flexibility complements the scalability dimension by investigating novel non-stacked protocol architecture. The goal of this review paper is to deploy ultra-low latency reduction framework for 5G communications considering flexibility and scalability. The Four (4) C framework consisting of cost, complexity, cross-layer and computing is hereby analyzed and discussed. The Four (4) C framework discusses several emerging new technologies of software defined network (SDN), network function virtualization (NFV) and fog networking. This review paper will contribute significantly towards the future implementation of flexible and high capacity ultra-low latency 5G communications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available