4.5 Article

LOW FREE (BUT NOT TOTAL) 25-HYDROXYVITAMIN D LEVELS IN SUBJECTS WITH NORMOCALCEMIC HYPERPARATHYROIDISM

Journal

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 174-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.4158/EP-2019-0325

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NPHPT) is characterized by elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels with persistently normal calcium levels. The diagnosis of NPHPT assumes the absence of secondary causes of elevated FTH levels. The objective of the current study was to examine levels of free 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) in NPHPT subjects and healthy controls. Methods: Ten NPHPT subjects and 20 controls who were age, sex, race, and body mass index (BMI) matched were examined. The diagnosis of NPHPT was made if subjects had (1) a serum calcium level of 8.6 to 10.4 mg/dL total 25(OH)D 30 to 40 ng/mL, and intact FTH (iPTH) >= 66 pg/mL; and (2) normal renal and liver function. Serum total 25(OH)D levels were measured by radioimmunoassay, and free 25(OH)D levels were determined using an enzyme-linked immunoassay. Results: Mean age of NPHPT subjects was 59.9 +/- 5.4 years, and mean BMI was 28.4 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2), which was not significantly different from the mean age and BMI of the control subjects. Mean total 25(OH)D level was 31.9 +/- 1.7 ng/mL in NPHPT subjects and did not differ from that of the controls (32.7 +/- 3.3 ng/mL; P = .52). However, mean free 25(OH)D was 5.0 +/- 0.9 pg/mL in NPHPT subjects, which was 20% lower compared to the mean of the controls (6.2 +/- 1.3 pgIng,; P = .013). Serum iPTH levels were inversely correlated with levels of measured free 25(OH)D (r = -0.42; P<.05) but did not correlate with levels of total 25(OH)D (r = -0.14; P>.10). Conclusion: Measured free 25(OH)D levels are lower in NPHPT subjects than in healthy control subjects. We suggest that some NPHPT subjects may actually have secondary hyperparathyroidism based on their free 25(OH) D levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available