Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate
Authors
Keywords
Adenoma, Sessile serrated polyp, Colonoscopy, Detection rates, Advanced neoplasia, Withdrawal time
Journal
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2019-08-30
DOI
10.1007/s10620-019-05808-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Adenoma Detection Rate in Asymptomatic Patients with Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests
- (2018) Eugene Kligman et al. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
- Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate
- (2018) Viral D. Patel et al. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
- Endoscopist factors that influence serrated polyp detection: a multicenter study
- (2018) Seth Crockett et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study
- (2018) Yunho Jung et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative
- (2017) Michal Kaminski et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death
- (2017) Michal F. Kaminski et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
- (2017) Douglas K. Rex et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
- (2017) Joseph C. Anderson et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum
- (2017) James E East et al. GUT
- Metformin use and the risk of colorectal adenoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2017) Yoon Suk Jung et al. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
- Polyp detection rate in transverse and sigmoid colon significantly increases with longer withdrawal time during screening colonoscopy
- (2017) Kazuhiro Kashiwagi et al. PLoS One
- Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality: A multicenter, long-term, colonoscopy-based cohort study
- (2017) Ryota Niikura et al. PLoS One
- Endoscopic Improvement of the Adenoma Detection Rate during Colonoscopy - Where Do We Stand in 2015?
- (2016) Martin Floer et al. DIGESTION
- Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists
- (2016) Stephan Vavricka et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Prevalence, distribution and risk of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps at a center with a high adenoma detection rate and experienced pathologists
- (2016) Joep IJspeert et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients
- (2016) Madhusudhan R. Sanaka et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Statin use and the risk of colorectal adenoma: A meta-analysis
- (2016) Yoon Suk Jung et al. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
- Global cancer statistics, 2012
- (2015) Lindsey A. Torre et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Correlation between adenoma and serrated lesion detection rates in an unselected outpatient population
- (2015) Pietro Occhipinti et al. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
- Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy
- (2015) Aasma Shaukat et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps
- (2015) Joep E.G. IJspeert et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: Time to revise quality standards?
- (2015) William A. Ross et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Serrated and Adenomatous Polyp Detection Increases With Longer Withdrawal Time: Results From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry
- (2014) Lynn Butterly et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014
- (2014) Rebecca Siegel et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Effect of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality
- (2014) Øyvind Holme et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death
- (2014) Douglas A. Corley et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies
- (2014) H. Brenner et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Colonic mucormycosis
- (2013) S. Rodrigues et al. ENDOSCOPY
- Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men
- (2013) Susan G. Coe et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Relationship between type-2 diabetes and use of metformin with risk of colorectal adenoma in an American population receiving colonoscopy
- (2013) Mehulkumar K. Kanadiya et al. JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
- Long-Term Mortality after Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- (2013) Aasma Shaukat et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Risk of colorectal adenomas and advanced neoplasia in Hispanic, black and white patients undergoing screening colonoscopy
- (2012) B. Lebwohl et al. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
- Serrated Lesions of the Colorectum: Review and Recommendations From an Expert Panel
- (2012) Douglas K Rex et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Body Mass Index Increases Risk for Colorectal Adenomas Based on Meta-analysis
- (2012) Qiwen Ben et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume
- (2012) Albert Do et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Long-Term Prevention of Colorectal-Cancer Deaths
- (2012) Ann G. Zauber et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Colorectal-Cancer Incidence and Mortality with Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy
- (2012) Robert E. Schoen et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Associations of Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol Consumption With Advanced or Multiple Colorectal Adenoma Risks: A Colonoscopy-based Case-Control Study in Korea
- (2011) A. Shin et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme
- (2011) Thomas J W Lee et al. GUT
- Once-Only Sigmoidoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Follow-up Findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE
- (2011) N. Segnan et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale
- (2010) Audrey H. Calderwood et al. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
- Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002)
- (2010) S. R. Cairns et al. GUT
- Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
- (2010) Wendy S Atkin et al. LANCET
- American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2008
- (2009) Douglas K Rex et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II) – Screening for colorectal cancer
- (2009) C. Arditi et al. ENDOSCOPY
- A Pooled Analysis of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Diagnoses After Colonoscopic Polypectomy
- (2008) María Elena Martínez et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started