4.7 Article

Single-Cell and Population-Level Analyses Using Real-Time Kinetic Labeling Couples Proliferation and Cell Death Mechanisms

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 277-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.08.016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [CA157740, CA206005, AI52417, F31AA024681]
  2. JJR Foundation
  3. William A. Spivak Fund
  4. Fridolin Charitable Trust
  5. American Cancer Society Research Scholar Award
  6. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Career Development Award
  7. Irma T. Hirschl/Monique WeillCaulier Trust Research Award
  8. March of Dimes Foundation [5FY1174, 1FY13416]
  9. Developmental Research Pilot Project Program within the Department of Oncological Sciences at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  10. Tisch Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support grant [P30 CA196521]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying cytostatic and cytotoxic outcomes are integral components of characterizing perturbagens used as research tools and in drug discovery pipe-lines. Furthermore, data-rich acquisition, coupled with robust methods for analysis, is required to properly assess the function and impact of these perturbagens. Here, we present a detailed and versatile method for single-cell and population-level analyses using real-time kinetic labeling (SPARKL). SPARKL integrates high-content live-cell imaging with automated detection and analysis of fluorescent reporters of cell death. We outline several examples of zero-handling, non-disruptive protocols for detailing cell death mechanisms and proliferation profiles. Additionally, we suggest several methods for mathematically analyzing these data to best utilize the collected kinetic data. Compared to traditional methods of detection and analysis, SPARKL is more sensitive, accurate, and high throughput while substantially eliminating sample processing and providing richer data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available