4.5 Article

Anti-infective therapy of peri-implant mucositis with adjunctive delivery of a sodium hypochlorite gel: a 6-month randomized triple-blind controlled clinical trial

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1971-1979

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03060-2

Keywords

Mucositis; Inflammation; Dental implant; Bleeding on probing; Biofilm; Sodium hypochlorite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate the effects of adjunctive delivery of a sodium hypochlorite gel in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (PM). Materials and methods Forty-six subjects with 68 implants diagnosed with PM were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Prior to mechanical debridement, a sodium hypochlorite gel was delivered to the implants of the test group while implants of the control group received a placebo gel. Application of both test and placebo gels was repeated 5 times at baseline. The primary outcome variable was the change in pocket probing depth (PPD) between baseline and 6 months. Results After 6 months, the mean PPD decreased statistically significantly from 3.93 +/- 1.09 mm to 3.04 +/- 0.46 mm in the test (p = 0.0001) and from 3.68 +/- 0.85 mm to 3.07 +/- 0.58 mm in the control (p = 0.0001) group, respectively. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.53) was observed with respect to PPD changes from baseline to 6 months between test (0.88 +/- 1.04 mm) and control group (0.61 +/- 0.75 mm), respectively. The number of implants with bleeding on probing (BoP) decreased statistically significantly from 33 to 18 in the test group (p = 0.0001) and from 34 to 23 in the control group (p = 0.0001) after 6 months. Conclusions In conclusion and within the limits of the present study, changes in PPD from baseline to 6 months were not statistically significantly different between groups. Complete resolution of mucosal inflammation was not achieved with either of the therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available