4.1 Article

Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery

Journal

CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 733-748

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000489

Keywords

robotic surgery; gynecology; minimally invasive surgery; controversies; MIS utilization; MIS costs

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA098252] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the standard approach to performance of several gynecologic procedures, including hysterectomy, gynecologic cancer staging procedures, myomectomy, pelvic organ prolapse repair, and select adnexal procedures. Robotic-assisted surgery, a computer-based MIS approach, has been adopted widely in the United States and several other countries. Robotics may offer technological and ergonomic benefits that overcome limitations associated with conventional laparoscopy; however, it is not clear that reported claims of superiority translate into improved gynecologic patient outcomes compared with other MIS approaches. This review critically appraises the evolving role, benefits, limitations, and controversies of robotic-assisted surgery utilization in benign and oncologic gynecology settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available