4.7 Article

The critical utilization of active heterotrophic microalgae for bioremoval of Cr(VI) in organics co-contaminated wastewater

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages 536-544

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.152

Keywords

Microalgae; Heterotrophic; Cr(VI); Organics; Wastewater; Bioremoval

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21736009]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2018J01016]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Provincial University Youth Key Program of China [JZ160401]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Xiamen, China [3502Z20173018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considering the importance of removing toxic Cr(VI) from practical wastewater containing complex pollutants, this study presented for the first time the utilization of the live heterotrophic microalgae (Botryocossuss sp. NJD-1) to achieve a concurrent abatement of Cr(VI), TOC, NO3-N and PO4-P, through a comprehensive biochemical process. The experimental results showed that the Cr(VI) removal efficiencies in the culture with different types of organic descended in the order of sodium acetate, ethanol and methanol. The highest removal efficiencies were achieved as 94.2%, 98.2%, 66.9% and 99.2% for Cr(VI), TOC, NO3-N and PO4-P, respectively, in the culture with 5 mg L-1 Cr(VI) and sodium acetate of equivalent to 2.92 gC L-1. Through mass balance calculation and characterization, the fate of Cr(Vl) and Cr(III) was tracked and quantified in the culture system, which indicates that 87.17% of initial Cr(Vl) were reduced to Cr(Ill) and then adsorbed in algal biomass for the optimal removal case. Consequently, the mechanism demonstrating the correlation among the removal process of Cr(VI), the biological activity of microalgae and the effect of organic compounds was proposed. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available