4.8 Article

Prospective analysis of circulating metabolites and breast cancer in EPIC

Journal

BMC MEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1408-4

Keywords

Breast cancer; Metabolomics; Prospective study

Funding

  1. French National Cancer Institute [2015-166]
  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer by Fondation ARC
  3. European Commission (DG-SANCO)
  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  5. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  6. Ligue Contre le Cancer (France)
  7. Institut Gustave Roussy (France)
  8. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale (France)
  9. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) (France)
  10. German Cancer Aid (Germany)
  11. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) (Germany)
  12. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Germany)
  13. Deutsche Krebshilfe (Germany)
  14. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (Germany)
  15. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
  16. Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece)
  17. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC-Italy (Italy)
  18. National Research Council (Italy)
  19. Dutch Ministry of Public Health (The Netherlands)
  20. Welfare and Sports (VWS) (The Netherlands)
  21. Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR) (The Netherlands)
  22. LK Research Funds (The Netherlands)
  23. Dutch Prevention Funds (The Netherlands)
  24. Dutch ZON (The Netherlands)
  25. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) (The Netherlands)
  26. Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands)
  27. European Research Council [ERC-2009-AdG 232997]
  28. Nordforsk (Norway)
  29. Nordic Centre of Excellence Programme on Food (Norway)
  30. Nutrition and Health (Norway)
  31. Regional Government of Andalucia
  32. Regional Government of Asturias
  33. Regional Government of Basque Country
  34. Regional Government of Murcia [6236]
  35. Regional Government of Navarra
  36. CERCA Program (Generalitat de Catalunya) (Spain)
  37. Swedish Cancer Society (Sweden)
  38. Swedish Research Council (Sweden)
  39. County Councils of Skane and Vasterbotten (Sweden)
  40. Cancer Research UK (Norfolk) [14136, C570/A16491, C8221/A19170]
  41. Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) [1000143, MR/M012190/1]
  42. MRC [MR/N003284/1, MR/L01341X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Metabolomics is a promising molecular tool to identify novel etiologic pathways leading to cancer. Using a targeted approach, we prospectively investigated the associations between metabolite concentrations in plasma and breast cancer risk. Methods A nested case-control study was established within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer cohort, which included 1624 first primary incident invasive breast cancer cases (with known estrogen and progesterone receptor and HER2 status) and 1624 matched controls. Metabolites (n = 127, acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, glycerophospholipids, hexose, sphingolipids) were measured by mass spectrometry in pre-diagnostic plasma samples and tested for associations with breast cancer incidence using multivariable conditional logistic regression. Results Among women not using hormones at baseline (n = 2248), and after control for multiple tests, concentrations of arginine (odds ratio [OR] per SD = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.90), asparagine (OR = 0.83 (0.74-0.92)), and phosphatidylcholines (PCs) ae C36:3 (OR = 0.83 (0.76-0.90)), aa C36:3 (OR = 0.84 (0.77-0.93)), ae C34:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78-0.94)), ae C36:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78-0.88)), and ae C38:2 (OR = 0.84 (0.76-0.93)) were inversely associated with breast cancer risk, while the acylcarnitine C2 (OR = 1.23 (1.11-1.35)) was positively associated with disease risk. In the overall population, C2 (OR = 1.15 (1.06-1.24)) and PC ae C36:3 (OR = 0.88 (0.82-0.95)) were associated with risk of breast cancer, and these relationships did not differ by breast cancer subtype, age at diagnosis, fasting status, menopausal status, or adiposity. Conclusions These findings point to potentially novel pathways and biomarkers of breast cancer development. Results warrant replication in other epidemiological studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available