4.6 Article

Highly effective activation of Mg-implanted p-type GaN by ultra-high-pressure annealing

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 115, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5116866

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MEXT Program for research and development of next-generation semiconductor to realize energysaving society
  2. Polish National Science Centre [2018/29/B/ST5/00338]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A high activation ratio of acceptors to Mg ions implanted into a homoepitaxial GaN layer was achieved through an ultra-high-pressure annealing (UHPA) process. Capless annealing under a nitrogen pressure of 1 GPa in a temperature range of 1573-1753 K activated acceptors without thermally decomposing the GaN layer. Conventional rapid thermal annealing leads to a serious decomposition at 1573 K, even with an AlN protective cap. The sample annealed at 1673 K under UHPA exhibited very intense cathodoluminescence in near-band edge and donor-acceptor-pair band emissions. The intensities were over one order of magnitude higher than those of the sample treated by conventional annealing. A Hall-effect measurement was obtained in the temperature range of 275-500 K for the UHPA sample. The obtained hole concentration and mobility at 300 K were 3.6 x 10(16) cm(-3) and 24.1 cm(2) V-1 s(-1), respectively. The mobility value was close to that of an epitaxial p-type GaN with the same doping concentration. An Arrhenius plot of hole concentrations showed that the acceptor concentration and ionization energy were separately estimated to be (2.6 +/- 0.8) x 10(18) cm(-3) and 212 +/- 5 meV, respectively. By comparing the Mg concentrations obtained from secondary ion mass spectrometry, the acceptor activation ratio (acceptor concentration/Mg concentration) of the UHPA samples exceeded 70%. These results suggest that the UHPA process as a postimplantation annealing technique is promising for the fabrication of GaN-based power devices with selective area doping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available