4.8 Article

Surface Reconstruction Limited Conductivity in Block-Copolymer Li Battery Electrolytes

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 48, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201905977

Keywords

block-copolymer electrolytes; electrode-electrolyte interface; ionic conductivity; lithium batteries; surface reconstruction

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [153764]
  2. Adolphe Merkle Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1707836]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries promise improvements in safety and energy density if their conductivity can be increased. Nanostructured block-copolymer electrolytes specifically have the potential to provide both good ionic conductivity and good mechanical properties. This study shows that the previously neglected nanoscale composition of the polymer electrolyte close to the electrode surface has an important effect on impedance measurements, despite its negligible extent compared to the bulk electrolyte. Using standard stainless steel blocking electrodes, the impedance of lithium salt-doped poly(isoprene-b-styrene-b-ethylene oxide) (ISO) exhibits a marked decrease upon thermal processing of the electrolyte. In contrast, covering the electrode surface with a low molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) brush results in higher and more reproducible conductivity values, which are insensitive to the thermal history of the device. A qualitative model of this effect is based on the hypothesis that ISO surface reconstruction at the different electrode surfaces leads to a change in the electrostatic double layer, affecting electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements. As a main result, PEO-brush modification of electrode surfaces is beneficial for the robust electrolyte performance of PEO-containing block-copolymers and may be crucial for their accurate characterization and use in Li-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available