4.6 Article

DPP9's Enzymatic Activity and Not Its Binding to CARD8 Inhibits Inflammasome Activation

Journal

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 2424-2429

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00462

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Josie Robertson Foundation
  2. Stand Up to Cancer-Innovative Research Grant [SU2C-AACR-IRG11-17]
  3. Stand Up to Cancer-Innovative Research Grant (Stand Up to Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation)
  4. Pew Charitable Trusts
  5. Pershing Square Sohn Cancer Research Alliance
  6. NIH [R01 AI137168, F30 CA243444, T32 GM007739]
  7. NIH (MSKCC Core Grant) [P30 CA008748]
  8. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship
  9. Gabrielle's Angel Foundation
  10. American Cancer Society [PF-17-224-01-CCG]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes formed in response to pathogens. NLRP1 and CARD8 are related proteins that form inflammasomes, but the pathogen-associated signal(s) and the molecular mechanisms controlling their activation have not been established. Inhibitors of the serine dipeptidyl peptidases DPP8 and DPP9 (DPP8/9) activate both NLRP1 and CARD8. Interestingly, DPP9 binds directly to NLRP1 and CARDS, and this interaction may contribute to the inhibition of NLRP1. Here, we use activity-based probes, reconstituted inflammasome assays, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics to further investigate the DPP9-CARD8 interaction. We show that the. DPP9-CARD8 interaction, unlike the DPP9-NLRP1 interaction, is not disrupted by DPP9 inhibitors or CARD8 mutations that block autoproteolysis. Moreover, wild-type, but not catalytically inactive mutant, DPP9 rescues CARD8-mediated cell death in DPP9 knockout cells. Together, this work reveals that DPP9's catalytic activity and not its binding to CARD8 restrains the CARDS inflammasome and thus suggests the binding interaction likely serves some other biological purpose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available