4.7 Review

Applications of Molecular Dynamics Simulation in Structure Prediction of Peptides and Proteins

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages 1162-1170

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.07.010

Keywords

Molecular dynamics; Protein folding; Cyclic peptides; Model refinement; Data-assisted modeling

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21573009]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20170412150507046, JCYJ20170412151002616]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared with rapid accumulation of protein sequences from high-throughput DNA sequencing, obtaining experimental 3D structures of proteins is still much more difficult, making protein structure prediction (PSP) potentially very useful. Currently, a vast majority of PSP efforts are based on data mining of known sequences, structures and their relationships (informatics-based). However, if dosely related template is not available, these methods are usually much less reliable than experiments. They may also be problematic in predicting the structures of naturally occurring or designed peptides. On the other hand, physics-based methods including molecular dynamics (MD) can utilize our understanding of detailed atomic interactions determining biomolecular structures. In this mini-review, we show that all-atom MD can predict structures of cyclic peptides and other peptide foldamers with accuracy similar to experiments. Then, some notable successes in reproducing experimental 3D structures of small proteins through MD simulations (some with replica-exchange) of the folding were summarized. We also describe advancements of MD-based refinement of structure models, and the integration of limited experimental or bioinformatics data into MD-based structure modeling. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available