4.1 Article

In-Vitro Pulsatile Flow Testing of Prosthetic Heart Valves: A Round-Robin Study by the ISO Cardiac Valves Working Group

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 397-422

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13239-019-00422-5

Keywords

Prosthetic heart valves; Hydrodynamic performance testing; Effective orifice area; Total regurgitant fraction; Mean pressure gradient; Waveform

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Hydrodynamic performance testing is one of the core in vitro assessments required by the ISO 5840 series of standards for all prosthetic heart valves. A round-robin study carried out in 2005 in accordance with ISO 5840:2005 revealed significant variabilities in prosthetic heart valve hydrodynamic performance measurements among the participating laboratories. In order to re-examine the inter-laboratory variability based on the state-of-the-art under ISO 5840-1 and 5840-2:2015, the ISO Cardiac Valve Working Groups decided in 2016 to repeat the round-robin study. Methods A total of 13 international laboratories participated in the study. The test valves were chosen to be the St. Jude Medical Masters Series mechanical valves (19 mm aortic, 25 mm aortic, 25 mm mitral, and 31 mm mitral), which were circulated among the laboratories. The testing was conducted according to a common test run sequence, with prespecified flow conditions. Results The study revealed improved, yet still significant variability among different laboratories as compared to the 2005 study. The coefficient of variation ranged from 7.7 to 21.6% for the effective orifice area, from 10.1 to 32.8% for the total regurgitant fraction, and from 14.7 to 45.5% for the mean transvalvular pressure gradient. Conclusions The study revealed the ambiguities in the current versions of the ISO 5840 series of standards and the shortcomings of some participating laboratories. This information has allowed the ISO Working Group to incorporate additional clarifying language into the ISO 5840-1, -2, and -3 standards that are currently under revision to improve in vitro assessments. The results presented here can also be used by the testing laboratories to benchmark pulse duplicator systems and to train and certify testing personnel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available