4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Association Between Time to Rehabilitation and Outcomes After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 97, Issue 10, Pages 1620-1627

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.009

Keywords

Models, econometric; Outcome assessment (health care); Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the relations between time to rehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI) and rehabilitation outcomes at discharge and 1-year postinjury. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Facilities designated as Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems. Participants: Patients (N=3937) experiencing traumatic SCI between 2000 and 2014, who were 18 years or older, and who were admitted to a model system within 24 hours of injury. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Rasch-transformed FIM motor score at discharge and 1-year postinjury, discharge to a private residence, and the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART) Physical Independence and Mobility scores at 1-year postinjury. Results: After accounting for health status, a 10% increase in time to rehabilitation was associated with a 1.50 lower FIM motor score at discharge (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.43 to -0.58; P=.001) and a 3.92 lower CHART Physical Independence score at 1-year postinjury (95% CI, -7.66 to -0.19; P=.04). Compared to the mean FIM motor score (37.5) and mean CHART Physical Independence score (74.7), the above-mentioned values represent relative declines of 4.0% and 5.3%, respectively. There was no association between time to rehabilitation and discharge to a private residence, 1-year FIM motor score, or the CHART mobility score. Conclusions: Earlier rehabilitation after traumatic SCI may improve patients' functional status at discharge. (C) 2016 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available