4.1 Article

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: When and for Whom?

Journal

CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-019-0918-0

Keywords

Prostate cancer; Hypofractionated radiotherapy; External beam radiotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of ReviewTo summarize recent evidence concerning the use of moderately hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy, defined as 2.4-3.4Gy per fraction, and ultrahypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (also known as stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]), defined as at least 5Gy per fraction, in men with localized prostate cancer.Recent FindingsTaken together, a number of recently completed randomized trials show that moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy confers similar biochemical control compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy without increasing late toxicity. These effects appear to extend across all baseline clinical risk groups. Several single-arm phase II studies, as well as a recently published large-scale randomized trial comparing SBRT with conventional fractionation, show very promising biochemical control and favorable acute and late treatment-related morbidity with the use of SBRT in predominantly low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.SummaryAs it is associated with similar prostate cancer control and toxicity while improving patient convenience and reducing cost, moderate hypofractionation is a preferred alternative to conventional fractionation in a majority of men with localized prostate cancer choosing radiotherapy as their primary treatment modality. To date, studies conducted largely in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer report encouraging oncologic outcomes and acceptable toxicity with SBRT. Mature results of phase III trials evaluating five-fraction SBRT regimens are eagerly awaited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available