Analysing Stakeholder Consensus for a Sustainable Transport Development Decision by the Fuzzy AHP and Interval AHP
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Analysing Stakeholder Consensus for a Sustainable Transport Development Decision by the Fuzzy AHP and Interval AHP
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Sustainability
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 3271
Publisher
MDPI AG
Online
2019-06-13
DOI
10.3390/su11123271
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A Comparative Study of Statistics-Based Landslide Susceptibility Models: A Case Study of the Region Affected by the Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal
- (2019) Sansar Meena et al. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
- Improving the Performance of Dry and Maritime Ports by Increasing Knowledge about the Most Relevant Functionalities of the Terminal Operating System (TOS)
- (2019) Miguel Hervás-Peralta et al. Sustainability
- AN AHP-ISM APPROACH FOR CONSIDERING PUBLIC PREFERENCES IN A PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT DECISION
- (2019) Szabolcs Duleba Transport
- Vulnerability evaluation of urban buildings to various earthquake intensities: a case study of the municipal zone 9 of Tehran
- (2019) Hossein Nazmfar et al. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
- A Novel Approach of Fuzzy Dempster–Shafer Theory for Spatial Uncertainty Analysis and Accuracy Assessment of Object-Based Image Classification
- (2018) Bakhtiar Feizizadeh IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
- Hospital enterprise Architecture Framework (Study of Iranian University Hospital Organization)
- (2018) Atefehsadat Haghighathoseini et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
- Comparing Classic and Interval Analytical Hierarchy Process Methodologies for Measuring Area-Level Deprivation to Analyze Health Inequalities
- (2018) Pablo Cabrera-Barona et al. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Can ISO-Defined Urban Sustainability Indicators Be Derived from Remote Sensing: An Expert Weighting Approach
- (2018) Arthur Lehner et al. Sustainability
- An interval matrix method used to optimize the decision matrix in AHP technique for land subsidence susceptibility mapping
- (2018) Omid Ghorbanzadeh et al. Environmental Earth Sciences
- An integrated MCDM approach considering demands-matching for reverse logistics
- (2018) Han Wang et al. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
- Sustainable Urban Transport Planning Considering Different Stakeholder Groups by an Interval-AHP Decision Support Model
- (2018) Omid Ghorbanzadeh et al. Sustainability
- Sustainable Urban Transport Development with Stakeholder Participation, an AHP-Kendall Model: A Case Study for Mersin
- (2018) Szabolcs Duleba et al. Sustainability
- Analytic Network Process-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Approach and Sensitivity Analysis for Temporary Facility Layout Planning in Construction Projects
- (2018) Haifeng Jin et al. Applied Sciences-Basel
- Examining Pareto optimality in analytic hierarchy process on real Data: An application in public transport service development
- (2018) Szabolcs Duleba et al. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- Multi-criteria risk evaluation by integrating an analytical network process approach into GIS-based sensitivity and uncertainty analyses
- (2017) Omid Ghorbanzadeh et al. Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk
- A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for curtain grouting efficiency assessment based on an AHP method extended by D numbers
- (2016) Guichao Fan et al. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- A novel hybrid artificial intelligent approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and particle swarm optimization for horizontal displacement modeling of hydropower dam
- (2016) Kien-Trinh Thi Bui et al. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
- Consistent completion of incomplete judgments in decision making using AHP
- (2015) J. Benítez et al. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS
- Application of analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and certainty factor models for groundwater potential mapping using GIS
- (2015) Yousef Razandi et al. Earth Science Informatics
- Spatially-explicit integrated uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of criteria weights in multicriteria land suitability evaluation
- (2014) Arika Ligmann-Zielinska et al. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
- Fuzzy AHP approach to selection problems in process engineering involving quantitative and qualitative aspects
- (2013) R.R. Tan et al. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
- Selecting the appropriate public transportation system to access the Sari International Airport by fuzzy decision making
- (2013) GholamAli Shafabakhsh et al. European Transport Research Review
- Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran
- (2012) Hamid Reza Pourghasemi et al. NATURAL HAZARDS
- Fuzzy decision support methodology for sustainable energy crop selection
- (2012) Ligita Balezentiene et al. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
- A dynamic analysis on public bus transport's supply quality by using AHP
- (2012) Szabolcs Duleba et al. Transport
- Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects
- (2010) Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal et al. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- The multi-actor, multi-criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice
- (2010) Cathy Macharis et al. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION
- Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices
- (2009) Fang Liu FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS
- Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems
- (2007) Johnny K.W. Wong et al. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started