4.5 Article

Learning Quality Rating of As-Cut me-Si Wafers via Convolutional Regression Networks

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 1064-1072

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2906036

Keywords

Convolutional neural network (CNN); densely connected neural network (DenseNet); high-performance multicrystalline silicon (HPM-Si); machine learning; material quality; multicrystalline silicon (me-Si); passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC); photoluminescence (PL); rating; regression; solar cell

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy through the project Q-Crystal [0324103A]
  2. German Academic Exchange Service within the program FITweltweit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the assessment of defects in multicrystalline silicon (me-Si) and high-performance me-Si wafers for solar cell production based on photoluminescence (PL) images. We identify and train a CNN regression model to forecast the T-V parameters of passivated emitter and rear cells from given PI, images of the as-cut wafers. The presented end-to-end model directly processes the PL image and does not rely on the human-designed image feature. Domain knowledge is replaced by a model based on a huge variety of empirical data. The comprehensive dataset allows for the evaluation of the generalizability of the model with test wafers from bricks and manufacturers not presented in the training set. We achieve mean absolute prediction errors as low as 0.11%(abs) in efficiency for test wafers from unknown bricks, which improves handcrafted feature-based methods by 35%(rel) at simultaneously lower computational costs for prediction. Samples with high prediction errors are investigated in detail showing an increased iron point defect concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available