4.3 Article

Characterization of Indoor Air Quality on a College Campus: A Pilot Study

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16152721

Keywords

indoor air; sustainability; LEED; higher education; public health; particulate matter

Funding

  1. Environmental Protection Agency's Science to Achieve Results (STAR) program [RD-835635]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent construction trends on college campuses have demonstrated a shift to designing buildings with features focused on sustainability. However, few studies have investigated indoor air quality in institutions of higher education, particularly in sustainably designed buildings. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of building and occupancy on indoor air quality within and between higher education buildings. We measured particulate matter, formaldehyde, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen oxides in LEED certified, retrofitted, and conventional building types on a college campus. Three size fractions of particulate matter were measured in each building. We conducted multi-zonal, 48-h measurements when the buildings were occupied and unoccupied. Outdoor particulate matter was significantly higher (PM2.5 = 4.76, PM4 = 17.1, and PM100 = 21.6 mu g/m(3)) than in classrooms (PM2.5 = 1.7, PM4 = 4.2, and PM100 = 6.7 mu g/m(3)) and common areas (PM2.5 = 1.3, PM4 = 4.2, and PM100 = 4.8 mu g/m(3); all p < 0.001). Additionally, concentrations of carbon dioxide and particulate matter were significantly higher (p < 0.05) during occupied sampling. The results suggest that occupancy status and building zone are major predictors of indoor air quality in campus buildings, which can, in turn, increase the concentration of contaminants, potentially impacting occupant health and performance. More research is warranted to reveal building features and human behaviors contributing to indoor exposures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available