4.5 Article

The ORACLE Children Study: educational outcomes at 11years of age following antenatal prescription of erythromycin or co-amoxiclav

Journal

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310144

Keywords

School Health; Fetal Medicine; Neurodevelopment; Outcomes research

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (ISCRT) [52995660]
  2. MRC [G9226450] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G9226450] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Antibiotics used for women in spontaneous preterm labour without overt infection, in contrast to those with preterm rupture of membranes, are associated with altered functional outcomes in their children. Methods From the National Pupil Database, we used Key Stage 2 scores, national test scores in school year 6 at 11years of age, to explore the hypothesis that erythromycin and co-amoxiclav were associated with poorer educational outcomes within the ORACLE Children Study. Results Anonymised scores for 97% of surviving children born to mothers recruited to ORACLE and resident in England were analysed against treatment group adjusting for key available socio-demographic potential confounders. No association with crude or with adjusted scores for English, mathematics or science was observed by maternal antibiotic group in either women with preterm rupture of membranes or spontaneous preterm labour with intact membranes. While the proportion receiving special educational needs was similar in each group (range 31.6-34.4%), it was higher than the national rate of 19%. Conclusions Despite evidence that antibiotics are associated with increased functional impairment at 7years, educational test scores and special needs at 11years of age show no differences between trial groups. Trial registration number ISCRT Number 52995660 (original ORACLE trial number).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available