4.7 Article

A zebrafish drug screening platform boosts the discovery of novel therapeutics for spinal cord injury in mammals

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47006-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Histology and Comparative Pathology Laboratory
  2. Fish Facility
  3. Rodent Facility
  4. Bioimaging Unit of the Instituto de Medicina Molecular
  5. Technophage S.A.
  6. FCT [PD/BD/114179/2016, PTDC/BOM-MED/3295/2014, PTDC/BIM-MED/3295/2014, SFRH/BPD/118051/2016]
  7. Congento [LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-022170]
  8. FCT (Portugal)
  9. Lisboa2020, under the PORTUGAL2020 agreement (European Regional Development Fund)
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BIM-MED/3295/2014, SFRH/BPD/118051/2016, PD/BD/114179/2016] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex condition, with limited therapeutic options, that results in sensory and motor disabilities. To boost discovery of novel therapeutics, we designed a simple and efficient drug screening platform. This innovative approach allows to determine locomotor rescue properties of small molecules in a zebrafish (Danio rerio) larval spinal cord transection model. We validated our screening platform by showing that Riluzole and Minocycline, two molecules that are in clinical trials for SCI, promote rescue of the locomotor function of the transected larvae. Further validation of the platform was obtained through the blind identification of D-Cycloserine, a molecule scheduled to enter phase IV clinical trials for SCI. Importantly, we identified Tranexamic acid and further showed that this molecule maintains its locomotor recovery properties in a rodent female contusion model. Our screening platform, combined with drug repurposing, promises to propel the rapid translation of novel therapeutics to improve SCI recovery in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available