Clinical features for diagnosis of pneumonia among adults in primary care setting: A systematic and meta-review
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Clinical features for diagnosis of pneumonia among adults in primary care setting: A systematic and meta-review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Scientific Reports
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2019-05-20
DOI
10.1038/s41598-019-44145-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Imaging for the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
- (2018) Michael S. Niederman CHEST
- Predictors of pneumonia in lower respiratory tract infections: 3C prospective cough complication cohort study
- (2017) Michael Moore et al. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
- Community-acquired pneumonia in primary care: clinical assessment and the usability of chest radiography
- (2016) A.B. Moberg et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
- External Validation of Prediction Models for Pneumonia in Primary Care Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis
- (2016) Alwin Schierenberg et al. PLoS One
- Clinical features for diagnosis of pneumonia in children younger than 5 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2015) Clotilde Rambaud-Althaus et al. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
- Prognostic value of procalcitonin in pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2015) Dan Liu et al. RESPIROLOGY
- The added diagnostic value of five different C-reactive protein point-of-care test devices in detecting pneumonia in primary care: A nested case-control study
- (2015) Margaretha C. Minnaard et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
- Management of patients with respiratory infections in primary care: procalcitonin, C-reactive protein or both?
- (2015) Marc Meili et al. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Use of serum C reactive protein and procalcitonin concentrations in addition to symptoms and signs to predict pneumonia in patients presenting to primary care with acute cough: diagnostic study
- (2013) S. F. van Vugt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- A decision aid to rule out pneumonia and reduce unnecessary prescriptions of antibiotics in primary care patients with cough and fever
- (2011) Johann Steurer et al. BMC Medicine
- Procalcitonin Levels Predict Bacteremia in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
- (2010) Fabian Müller et al. CHEST
- A Systematic Review on the Diagnosis of Pediatric Bacterial Pneumonia: When Gold Is Bronze
- (2010) Tim Lynch et al. PLoS One
- Primary care summary of the British Thoracic Society Guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: 2009 update Endorsed by the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Primary Care Respiratory Society UK
- (2010) Mark L Levy et al. Primary Care Respiratory Journal
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Accuracy of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and fibrinogen compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating pneumonia from acute bronchitis in primary care
- (2009) Rogier M Hopstaken et al. Primary Care Respiratory Journal
- C-reactive protein and community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory care: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies
- (2008) G. Falk et al. FAMILY PRACTICE
- Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of ROC Curves
- (2008) L.R. Arends et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started