4.5 Article

A pooled analysis of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Journal

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 4489-4498

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S202875

Keywords

transarterial radioembolization; yttrium-90 microspheres; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; pooled analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The aim of this pooled analysis was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium- 90 (Y-90) microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, SCI with the English language from inception to October 2018. A pooled analysis was conducted using Stata software. Results: There were 16 eligible studies included in this pooled analysis. The pooled median overall survival (OS) from 12 studies was 14.3 (95% CI: 11.9- 17.1) months. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), no complete response was reported, and the median of partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were 11.5% (range: 4.8- 35.3%), 61.5% (range: 42.9- 81.3%) and 22.7% (range: 12.5- 52.4%) respectively. The pooled disease control rate (DCR) from nine studies was 77.2% (95% CI: 70.2- 84.2%). According to the type of microspheres, subgroup analysis was performed, the median OS in the glass microspheres group was 14.0 (95% CI: 9.1- 21.4) months, and 14.3 (95% CI: 11.5- 17.8) months in the resin microspheres group. The DCR was 77.3% (95% CI: 63.5- 91.1%) and 77.4% (95% CI: 66.8- 87.9%) in the glass and resin microspheres groups respectively. Most of the side effects reported in the included studies were mild and did not require intervention. Conclusion: TARE with Y-90 microspheres is safe and effective for patients with unresectable ICC with acceptable side effects. And it seems that the type of microsphere has no influence on therapeutic efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available