Trials need participants but not their feedback? A scoping review of published papers on the measurement of participant experience of taking part in clinical trials
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Trials need participants but not their feedback? A scoping review of published papers on the measurement of participant experience of taking part in clinical trials
Authors
Keywords
Trial, Participation, Patient experience, Patient satisfaction, Patient-centred trials
Journal
Trials
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2019-06-25
DOI
10.1186/s13063-019-3444-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study
- (2018) Patricia Healy et al. Trials
- Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?
- (2018) Shaun Treweek et al. Trials
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2018) Joanna C Crocker et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches
- (2017) Daisy Elliott et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Theory-based and evidence-based design of audit and feedback programmes: examples from two clinical intervention studies
- (2017) Sylvia J Hysong et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Strategy for recruitment and factors associated with motivation and satisfaction in a randomized trial with 210 healthy volunteers without financial compensation
- (2015) Quentin Luzurier et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Consent revisited: the impact of return of results on participants' views and expectations about trial participation
- (2015) Carolyn Tarrant et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
- (2015) Daisy Townsend et al. Trials
- A little more conversation please? Qualitative study of researchers’ and patients’ interview accounts of training for patient and public involvement in clinical trials
- (2015) Louise Dudley et al. Trials
- What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials
- (2015) Louise Dudley et al. PLoS One
- Impact of patient involvement in mental health research: longitudinal study
- (2013) Liam Ennis et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Assessing Participant-Centered Outcomes to Improve Clinical Research
- (2013) Rhonda G. Kost et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Evidence base for patient and public involvement in clinical trials (EPIC)
- (2013) Carrol Gamble et al. Trials
- A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
- (2013) Ben G O Sully et al. Trials
- Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: a responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences
- (2013) Maarten de Wit et al. BMJ Open
- Development of a Research Participants’ Perception Survey to Improve Clinical Research
- (2012) Jennifer L. Yessis et al. CTS-Clinical and Translational Science
- Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? Evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey
- (2012) Charlotte Paddison et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials
- (2011) Nicola Mills et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Experiences of families with a child, adolescent, or young adult with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibroma evaluated for clinical trials participation at the National Cancer Institute
- (2010) Staci Martin et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
- (2010) Danielle Levac et al. Implementation Science
- Factors influencing the participation of older people in clinical trials — data analysis from the MAVIS trial
- (2010) P. Fearn et al. Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging
- How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?
- (2008) M. S Fewtrell et al. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
- Development of a complex intervention improved randomization and informed consent in a randomized controlled trial
- (2008) Jenny L. Donovan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now