4.3 Article

Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART): Conceptual Considerations for the Informed Clinician

Journal

SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 258-273

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Andrew Sabin Family Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  3. National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial Research Award [1R01DE025248-01/R56DE025248-01]
  4. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Early Phase Clinical Trials in Imaging and Image -Guided Interventions Program [1R01 CA218148-01]
  5. NIH/NCI Head and Neck Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE) Developmental Research Program Award [P50 CA097007-10]
  6. National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Mathematical Sciences
  7. NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) Program of the National Cancer Institute Early Stage Development of Technologies in Biomedical Computing, Informatics, and Big Data Science Award [1R01CA214825-01]
  8. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) Pilot Research Program Award from the UT MD Anderson CCSG Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging Program [P30CA016672]
  9. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) Research Education Program [R25EB025787]
  10. Elekta AB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For nearly 2 decades, adaptive radiation therapy (ART) has been proposed as a method to account for changes in head and neck tumor and normal tissue to enhance therapeutic ratios. While technical advances in imaging, planning and delivery have allowed greater capacity for ART delivery, and a series of dosimetric explorations have consistently shown capacity for improvement, there remains a paucity of clinical trials demonstrating the utility of ART. Furthermore, while ad hoc implementation of head and neck ART is reported, systematic full-scale head and neck ART remains an as yet unreached reality. To some degree, this lack of scalability may be related to not only the complexity of ART, but also variability in the nomenclature and descriptions of what is encompassed by ART. Consequently, we present an overview of the history, current status, and recommendations for the future of ART, with an eye toward improving the clarity and description of head and neck ART for interested clinicians, noting practical considerations for implementation of an ART program or clinical trial. Process level considerations for ART are noted, reminding the reader that, paraphrasing the writer Elbert Hubbard, Art is not a thing, it is a way. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available