4.4 Article

USE OF CHOROIDAL VASCULARITY INDEX FOR CHOROIDAL STRUCTURAL EVALUATION IN CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY WITH CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION

Journal

RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 1395-1402

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002585

Keywords

central serous chorioretinopathy; choroidal neovascularization; choroidal vascularity index; choroidal vasculature; choroidal thickness

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2016R1A6A1A03010528]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate choroidal vascular structure in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) by assessing the choroidal vascular index (CVI). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 117 eyes with CSC. Subjects were divided into 4 groups according to clinical characteristics: 1) acute CSC (N = 29), 2) non-neovascularized chronic CSC without flat irregular pigment epithelial detachment (N = 49), 3) non-neovascularized chronic CSC with flat irregular pigment epithelial detachment (N = 21), and 4) chronic CSC with choroidal neovascularization (N = 18). Subfoveal choroidal area (1,500 mm) of swept source optical coherence tomography scans were divided into luminal and stromal areas by the image binarization technique. The CVI was defined as the ratio of the luminal to the total subfoveal choroidal area. Results: The CVI was significantly lower in eyes of Group 4 than those of other groups (allP< 0.05). The subfoveal choroidal thickness was significantly lower in Group 4 than in Groups 1 and 2 (P< 0.05), but regression analysis showed no association with the CVI. Conclusion: Decreased CVI may reflect choroidal vascular structure changes in eyes with choroidal neovascularization complicating CSC. These findings suggest that the CVI could be useful for evaluating choroidal vascular changes in eyes with CSC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available