4.5 Article

Code blue pit crew model: A novel approach to in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation

Journal

RESUSCITATION
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages 158-164

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.290

Keywords

Resuscitation; Code blue; Pit crew; Team training; Simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Mortalityfrom in-hospital cardiac arrests remains a large problem world-wide. In an effortto improve in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality, there is a renewed focus on team training and operations. Here, we describe the implementation of a pit crew model to provide in-hospital resuscitation care. Methods: In order to improve our institution's code team organization, we implemented a pit crew resuscitation model. The model was introduced through computer-based modules and lectures and was reemphasized at our institution-based ACLS training and mock code events. To assess the effect of our model, we reviewed pre- and post-pit crew implementation data from five sources: defibrillator downloads, a centralized hospital database, mock codes, expert-led debriefings, and confidential surveys. Data with continuous variables and normal distribution were analyzed using a standard two-sample t-test. For yes/no categorical data either a Z-test for difference between proportions or Chi-square test was used. Results: There were statistically significant improvements in compression rates post-intervention (mean rate 133.5 pre vs. 127.9 post, two-tailed, p= 0.02) and in adequate team communication (33% pre vs. 100% post; p = 0.05). There were also trends toward a reduction in the number of shockable rhythms that were not defibrillated (32.7% pre vs. 18.4% post), average time to shock (mean 1.96 min pre vs. 1.69 min post), and overall survival to discharge (31% pre vs. 37% post), though these did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Implementation of an in-hospital, pit crew resuscitation model is feasible and can improve both code team communication as well as key ACLS metrics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available