Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event‐related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event‐related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2019-07-19
DOI
10.1111/psyp.13437
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science
- (2019) Jennifer L. Tackett et al. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- Quantifying evidential value and selective reporting in recent and 10-year past psychophysiological literature: A pre-registered P-curve analysis
- (2019) Kaylie A. Carbine et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Psychology's Renaissance
- (2018) Leif D. Nelson et al. Annual Review of Psychology
- Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis
- (2018) Patrick E. Shrout et al. Annual Review of Psychology
- Data quality over data quantity in computational cognitive neuroscience
- (2018) Antonio Kolossa et al. NEUROIMAGE
- The preregistration revolution
- (2018) Brian A. Nosek et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Perceived crisis and reforms: Issues, explanations, and remedies.
- (2018) Paul De Boeck et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
- Sample size calculations in human electrophysiology (EEG and ERP) studies: A systematic review and recommendations for increased rigor
- (2017) Michael J. Larson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Psychometric considerations in the measurement of event-related brain potentials: Guidelines for measurement and reporting
- (2017) Peter E. Clayson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Improving the rigor of psychophysiology research
- (2017) Scott A. Baldwin INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Best practices for repeated measures ANOVAs of ERP data: Reference, regional channels, and robust ANOVAs
- (2017) Joseph Dien INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- ERP Reliability Analysis (ERA) Toolbox: An open-source toolbox for analyzing the reliability of event-related brain potentials
- (2017) Peter E. Clayson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Rigor and replication in time-frequency analyses of cognitive electrophysiology data
- (2017) Michael X Cohen INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research
- (2017) Russell A. Poldrack et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data
- (2017) Russell A. Poldrack et al. NEUROIMAGE
- Comparing the error-related negativity across groups: The impact of error- and trial-number differences
- (2017) Adrian G. Fischer et al. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- How many trials does it take to get a significant ERP effect? It depends
- (2017) Megan A. Boudewyn et al. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Measurement error and the replication crisis
- (2017) Eric Loken et al. SCIENCE
- Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
- (2017) Denes Szucs et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The Patient Repository for EEG Data + Computational Tools (PRED+CT)
- (2017) James F. Cavanagh et al. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
- Discrete pre-processing step effects in registration-based pipelines, a preliminary volumetric study on T1-weighted images
- (2017) Nathan M. Muncy et al. PLoS One
- Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide
- (2016) Wolfgang Forstmeier et al. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
- Commitment to Cutting-Edge Research with Rigor and Replication in Psychophysiological Science by Michael J. Larson
- (2016) Michael J. Larson INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't)
- (2016) Steven J. Luck et al. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Digital filter design for electrophysiological data – a practical approach
- (2015) Andreas Widmann et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
- Sex moderates the association between symptoms of anxiety, but not obsessive compulsive disorder, and error-monitoring brain activity: A meta-analytic review
- (2015) Jason S. Moser et al. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
- (2014) John P A Ioannidis et al. LANCET
- The Reporting of Observational Clinical Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies: A Systematic Review
- (2014) Qing Guo et al. PLoS One
- Better living through transparency: Improving the reproducibility of fMRI results through comprehensive methods reporting
- (2013) Joshua Carp COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
- Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Committee report: Publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography
- (2013) Andreas Keil et al. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
- Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: the OpenfMRI project
- (2013) Russell A. Poldrack et al. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
- The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature
- (2012) Joshua Carp NEUROIMAGE
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated
- (2008) John P. A. Ioannidis EPIDEMIOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search