Is risk-stratified breast cancer screening economically efficient in Germany?
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Is risk-stratified breast cancer screening economically efficient in Germany?
Authors
Keywords
Death rates, Breast cancer, Mammography, Cancer screening, Biopsy, Cancer detection and diagnosis, Cancer treatment, Germany
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages e0217213
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2019-05-24
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0217213
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Using Breast Cancer Risk Associated Polymorphisms to Identify Women for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
- (2017) Elad Ziv et al. PLoS One
- Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies
- (2016) Jeanne S. Mandelblatt et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Adherence to the breast cancer surveillance program for women at risk for familial breast and ovarian cancer versus overscreening: a monocenter study in Germany
- (2016) Lisa Vetter et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- Randomized controlled trial of stereotactic 11-G vacuum-assisted core biopsy for the diagnosis and management of mammographic microcalcification
- (2016) Sara M Bundred et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
- Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density
- (2016) Stefanie Weigel et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
- Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Supplemental Ultrasonography Screening for Women With Dense Breasts
- (2015) Brian L. Sprague et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The prognostic impact of age in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer
- (2015) Cornelia Liedtke et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- Effects on short-term quality of life of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography
- (2015) Alberto Tagliafico et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
- Breast-Cancer Screening — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group
- (2015) Béatrice Lauby-Secretan et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- A Web Tool for Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates
- (2014) P. S. Rosenberg et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Communicating the Parameter Uncertainty in the IQWiG Efficiency Frontier to Decision-Makers
- (2014) Björn Stollenwerk et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Benefits, Harms, and Costs for Breast Cancer Screening After US Implementation of Digital Mammography
- (2014) Natasha K. Stout et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Cost-Effectiveness and Harm-Benefit Analyses of Risk-Based Screening Strategies for Breast Cancer
- (2014) Ester Vilaprinyo et al. PLoS One
- Mammographic Performance in a Population-based Screening Program: Before, during, and after the Transition from Screen-Film to Full-Field Digital Mammography
- (2014) Solveig Hofvind et al. RADIOLOGY
- Using Clinical Factors and Mammographic Breast Density to Estimate Breast Cancer Risk: Development and Validation of a New Predictive Model
- (2013) Jeffrey A. Tice et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Mammography Breast Cancer Screening
- (2013) Anna N.A. Tosteson et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Personalizing Mammography by Breast Density and Other Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: Analysis of Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness
- (2013) John T. Schousboe et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Perceived risk and adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines among women with a familial history of breast cancer: A review of the literature
- (2013) Meghan J. Walker et al. BREAST
- Outcomes of Screening Mammography by Frequency, Breast Density, and Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy
- (2013) Karla Kerlikowske et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Quantifying the Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography
- (2013) H. Gilbert Welch et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- State-Transition Modeling
- (2012) Uwe Siebert et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Treatment pattern by hormone receptors and HER2 status in patients with metastatic breast cancer in the UK, Germany, France, Spain and Italy (EU-5): results from a physician survey
- (2012) Mitch DeKoven et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Health-related Quality of Life in Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: short-term effects, long-term effects and predictors
- (2010) Philip J Domeyer et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- The efficiency frontier approach to economic evaluation of health-care interventions
- (2010) J. Jaime Caro et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Assessment of Clinical Validity of a Breast Cancer Risk Model Combining Genetic and Clinical Information
- (2010) M. E. Mealiffe et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anastrozole versus Tamoxifen in Adjuvant Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer – A Health-Economic Analysis Based on the 100-Month Analysis of the ATAC Trial and the German Health System
- (2010) Michael P. Lux et al. ONKOLOGIE
- Full-Field Digital versus Screen-Film Mammography: Comparison within the UK Breast Screening Program and Systematic Review of Published Data
- (2009) Sarah Vinnicombe et al. RADIOLOGY
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now