4.7 Article

Development and Application of Real-Time and Conventional SSR-PCR Assays for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Didymella pisi Associated with Ascochyta Blight of Dry Pea

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages 2751-2758

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-02-19-0381-RE

Keywords

field crops; fungi; pathogen detection; techniques

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Plant Science and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Regional Pulse Crop Diagnostic Laboratory, Bozeman, MT - USDA/Montana Farm Bill [16-8530-1769CA-FB]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Didymella pisi is the primary causal pathogen of Ascochyta blight (AB) of dry pea in Montana. Diagnosis of AB is challenging because there are six different species that cause AB worldwide and that can co-occur. Additionally, agar plate identification of D. pisi is challenging due to its slow growth rate. Currently, there are no PCR-based assays developed for specific detection of D. pisi or any fungal pathogen in the AB complex of dry pea. In this study, we evaluated simple sequence repeat (SSR) primer pairs for their specificity and sensitivity in real-time and conventional SSR-PCR both in vitro and in planta. The specificity of the assay was determined by testing DNA of 10 dry pea varieties, fungal species in the AB complex, and fungal species associated with dry pea. To avoid false-negative results, plant and fungal DNA markers were included as controls in a conventional multiplex SSR-PCR, to amplify any plant or fungal DNA in the absence of the D. pisi SSR target. SYBR Green SSR-quantitative PCR (qPCR) detection was conducted using the same primer pairs but in a uniplex format. D. pisi was specifically amplified, whereas other fungi and host DNA were not. Also, sensitivity experiments showed that the detection limit was 0.01 ng of DNA of D. pisi for both assays and 100 conidia in SSR-qPCR. These assays are valuable diagnostic tools for the detection of D. pisi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available