4.1 Article

Comparative Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children: Racial Disparity May Begin Early in Childhood

Journal

PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 1183-1189

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-019-02129-9

Keywords

Racial disparity; Cardiorespiratory fitness; Pediatric exercise; Exercise stress testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

African American (AA) adults are reported to have lower levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) as compared to Caucasian adults. CRF is linked to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that the disparities start early in childhood. This was a retrospective analysis of the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). We included normal healthy children, <= 18 years of age, who had normal electrocardiograms and normal cardiac function. We excluded patients with congenital heart disease, obesity and suboptimal exercise test. The entire cohort was divided into two groups based on race (Caucasian vs. AA) and then further subcategorized by gender. The cohort of 248 patients had a mean +/- SD age of 14.4 +/- 2.1 years. 158 (60.8%) were males and 158 (60.8%) were Caucasians. Oxygen consumption was higher among Caucasian children when compared to the AA children (48.7 +/- 7.9 vs. 45.4 +/- 7 mL/kg/min, p = 0.01). This racial disparity continued to persist when comparisons were performed separately for girls and boys. Upon comparing the four groups, the AA females were found to have the lowest values of VO2max, exercise time and METS (p = 0.001). Thus, in conclusion, the AA children have significantly lower level of CRF, as measured by VO2max and exercise time. The racial disparity is independent of gender. African American females show the lowest level of aerobic capacity. The findings of our study suggest that the racial disparity in the CRF levels seen in the adult population may begin early in childhood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available