4.7 Article

Survival and immune-related gene expression in Litopenaeus vannamei co-infected with WSSV and Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 464, Issue -, Pages 692-698

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.08.024

Keywords

Litopenaeus vannamei; WSSV; AHPND; Vibrio parahaemolyticus; Gene expression

Funding

  1. Secretaria de Investigacion y Posgrado del Instituto Politecnico Nacional (SIP-IPN)
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT-Mexico)
  3. SIP-IPN [254]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, survival and immune-related gene expression were investigated in atopenaeus vannamei co-infected with white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and Vibrio parahaemolyticus by ingestion and immersion, respectively.The expression of five immune-related genes (translationally controlled tumor protein ITCTPI, toll receptor [LvTolll, penaeidin4, crustin, and lysozyme) in hemocytes of experimental shrimp was measured by realtime quantitative PCR. Shrimp infected first with V. parahaemolyticus and then with WSSV showed a mortality of 46.66 +/- 0.88%. Shrimp infected first with WSSV and then with V. parahaemolytiais showed a mortality of 45.00 +/- 1.53%. Shrimp infected with WSSV and V. parahaemolyticus at the same time showed a mortality of 55.00 +/- 2.08%. Gene expression of LvToll, crustin, and lysozyme was upregulated whereas gene expression of TCTP and penaeidin4 was downregulated. Under the present experimental conditions and infection routes, V. pm-ahaernolyticus was the main responsible for the mortality of cultured white shrimp. Regarding immune response, significant changes were found in gene expression in hemocytes of L vannamei during the time-course of a successful immune response to pathogens V. parahaemolyticus and WSSV. Statement of relevance: Bacterial and viral co-infection in white shrimp culture. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available