4.7 Article

Experimental study on cooling performance of sinusoidal-wavy minichannel heat sink

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 50-61

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.015

Keywords

Sinusoidal-wavy MCHS; Wave length; Wave amplitude; Prandtl number; Experimental

Funding

  1. Islamic Azad University (IAU) Shahrood Branch

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cooling performance of the sinusoidal-wavy minichannel heat sink (SWMCHS) having square cross section is experimentally investigated. The effects of specific geometrical parameters of the SWMCHS, i.e. wave length (l = 10, 20, and 40 mm) and wave amplitude (a = 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm), are examined. Each SWMCHS is made of aluminum and contains eight minichannels in parallel. The water-ethylene glycol mixtures (100:0, 75:25 and 50:50 by mass) are selected as working fluids to investigate the effect of coolant. This study covers Reynolds number in the range of 60-4000, covering both the laminar and the transition flow regimes based on the applied working fluid. Heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics of the SWMCHSs are obtained and the results are compared with a straight MCHS. The results show that the thermal performance of the SWMCHSs is much better than the straight MCHS. Both the heat transfer coefficient and the pressure drop inside the SWMCHSs increase proportionally, as the wave length decreases and the wave amplitude increases. It is found that in the studied range, the water-ethylene glycol mixture of 100:0 shows the greatest values of the heat transfer rate to pumping power ratio. Also, there is an optimum geometry for the SWMCHS (a = 40 mm and 1 = 1 0 mm), which has the maximum values of the heat transfer rate to pumping power ratio. Finally, correlations are developed for the SWMCHSs as function of Reynolds number, Prandtl number, and geometrical parameters. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available