4.7 Article

Age-dependent association of white matter abnormality with cognition after TIA or minor stroke

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages E272-E282

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007772

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Wolfson Foundation
  3. British Heart Foundation
  4. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford
  5. Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate if the association between MRI-detectable white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and cognitive status reported in previous studies persists at older ages (>80 years), when some white matter abnormality is almost universally reported in clinical practice. Methods Consecutive eligible patients from a population-based cohort of all TIA/nondisabling stroke (Oxford Vascular Study) underwent multimodal MRI, including fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and diffusion-weighted imaging, allowing automated measurement of WMH volume, mean diffusivity (MD), and fractional anisotropy (FA) in normal-appearing white matter using FSL tools. These measures were related to cognitive status (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) at age <= 80 vs >80 years. Results Of 566 patients (mean [range] age 66.7 [20-102] years), 107 were aged >80 years. WMH volumes and MD/FA were strongly associated with cognitive status in patients aged <= 80 years (all p < 0.001 for WMH, MD, and FA) but not in patients aged >80 years (not significant for WMH, MD, and FA), with age interactions for WMH volume (p(interaction) = 0.016) and MD (p(interaction) = 0.037). Voxel-wise analyses also showed that lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were associated with frontal WMH in patients <= 80 years, but not >80 years. Conclusion MRI markers of white matter damage are strongly related to cognition in patients with TIA/minor stroke at younger ages, but not at age >80 years. Clinicians and patients should not overinterpret the significance of these abnormalities at older ages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available